HereIbe...a highraccountN'america...comegetme!!!
The television series "Reign" has begun an heretical new following of Mary Stuart, according to their foreauthors fairytale parade full of blasphemy and XXX.
As if we didn't get enough high end pornography from the Tudor series, once again, we must witness more of this license to royal fraud by a throne that never was one in the first place?
No one has ever published the truth about Mary Stuart, or the confusion she reigns in alongside her dubious double, Bludy Mary, they've twisted into another lie for Mary Tudor. Is she just one in the same person?
Who knew who actually inquisitioned and dissolved the monasteries of King Edward VI and Queen Jane (Seymour not Grey) along with Wyatts rebellion, and burned the majority of them at the stake in Edinburgh? It was bludy Mary, queen of Scotts who married John Dudley,(Lyle Darnley) and years later were blown away in an explosion, along with their heir to the throne, James.
What profusely mundane spewing they come up with, continually resorting to calling these murderers instead martyrs of Elizabeth, (or KathrynAnne the imposter/pretender) whom we shall meet in the third season of Reign. Of course, these version of bludy Elizabeth come from the authorizations of Kathryn and her son, James/Latimer Howard, who replaced Elizabeths brother EdwardVI on the throne of the monasteries. Kathryn and Latimer stole the translations of scripture, eventually calling him Mary's son, and conveniently covering the heir's demise.
I can barely endure more of this lying foreauthorization for Shakespearean drama, with Kathryn's son, king James/LatimerCowards paradeO'drag-queens to Dublin where they've been filming Reign. When Mary goes to Scottland, she will no doubt be all about stirring up the delusional versong of all her pretenders~ the old crow who eatup with the nest all over her bludy head, she can't seem to get well, off.
I am expecting to watch their wretched version of Elizabeth turn bludy Mary into a martyr of the Shakespearean cause for an erroneous authorization of a pen name their twisted whorerstories represent. Anyone dare question Shakespeare lately? --Yet that will be another story altogether, of course.
The television series "Reign" has begun an heretical new following of Mary Stuart, according to their foreauthors fairytale parade full of blasphemy and XXX.
As if we didn't get enough high end pornography from the Tudor series, once again, we must witness more of this license to royal fraud by a throne that never was one in the first place?
No one has ever published the truth about Mary Stuart, or the confusion she reigns in alongside her dubious double, Bludy Mary, they've twisted into another lie for Mary Tudor. Is she just one in the same person?
Who knew who actually inquisitioned and dissolved the monasteries of King Edward VI and Queen Jane (Seymour not Grey) along with Wyatts rebellion, and burned the majority of them at the stake in Edinburgh? It was bludy Mary, queen of Scotts who married John Dudley,(Lyle Darnley) and years later were blown away in an explosion, along with their heir to the throne, James.
What profusely mundane spewing they come up with, continually resorting to calling these murderers instead martyrs of Elizabeth, (or KathrynAnne the imposter/pretender) whom we shall meet in the third season of Reign. Of course, these version of bludy Elizabeth come from the authorizations of Kathryn and her son, James/Latimer Howard, who replaced Elizabeths brother EdwardVI on the throne of the monasteries. Kathryn and Latimer stole the translations of scripture, eventually calling him Mary's son, and conveniently covering the heir's demise.
I can barely endure more of this lying foreauthorization for Shakespearean drama, with Kathryn's son, king James/LatimerCowards paradeO'drag-queens to Dublin where they've been filming Reign. When Mary goes to Scottland, she will no doubt be all about stirring up the delusional versong of all her pretenders~ the old crow who eatup with the nest all over her bludy head, she can't seem to get well, off.
I am expecting to watch their wretched version of Elizabeth turn bludy Mary into a martyr of the Shakespearean cause for an erroneous authorization of a pen name their twisted whorerstories represent. Anyone dare question Shakespeare lately? --Yet that will be another story altogether, of course.
